Anonymous Claims It Stopped Karl Rove From Hacking The Election

November 16, 2012

This document turned up in the Velvet Revolution mailbox a few days ago. I received the scan the morning of November 15th.

Anon Karl Rove letter

VelvetRevolution offered a million dollar reward for anyone who brought information that leads to the conviction of Karl Rove. Like me, Brett Kimberlin has become a go to guy for stuff like this, thanks to Lee Stranahan‘s tremendous advertising effort last summer. Brett and I would both be obscure nobodies if it weren’t for the tremendous effort put forth by Ali Akbar and the National Bloggers Club to promote Swatgate as a planned component of their failed October Surprise!

They don’t explicitly name Smartech but I’m pretty sure that is what they’re talking about with the ‘tunnels’ stuff.

Greetings to the good people of the Velvet Revolution
8 November 2012

Please we were to see that you put your faith in the hands of we protectors of democracy, and tempted too to claim your generous reward. But wealth does not drive us.

Two months prior to your offer, we chose to take a action against those who have subverted the will of the people in past elections, which resulted in terrible destruction across the globe. We began following the digital traffic of one Karl Rove, a disrespected of the Rule Of Law, knowing that he claimed to be a Kingmaker while grifting vast wealth from barons who glady handed him gold to anoint another King while looking the other way.

MORE…

http://nealrauhauser.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/the-protectors-claim-orca-smartech-hacks/

Stay Connected!
Facebook:	Twitter:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

"We have always distinguished the social kernel from the political form of bourgeois democracy; we have always revealed the hard kernel of social inequality and lack of freedom hidden under the sweet shell of formal equality and freedom – not in order to reject the latter but to spur the working class into not being satisfied with the shell, but rather, by conquering political power, to create a socialist democracy to replace bourgeois democracy – not to eliminate democracy altogether."

"But socialist democracy is not something which begins only in the promised land, after the foundations of socialist economy are created; it does not come as some sort of Christmas present for the worthy people who, in the interim, have loyally supported a handful of socialist dictators. Socialist democracy begins simultaneously with the beginnings of the destruction of class rule and of the construction of socialism. It begins at the very moment of the seizure of power by the socialist party. It is the same thing as the dictatorship of the proletariat. Yes, dictatorship! "

"But this dictatorship consists in the manner of applying democracy, not in its elimination, but in energetic, resolute attacks upon the well-entrenched rights and economic relationships of bourgeois society, without which a socialist transformation cannot be accomplished. But this dictatorship must be the work of the class and not of a little leading minority in the name of the class – that is, it must proceed step by step out of the active participation of the masses; it must be under their direct influence, subjected to the control of complete public activity; it must arise out of the growing political training of the mass of the people."

Rosa Luxemburg